Worldly Mystery

What is a vaccine against homosexuality? Is there such a thing? This issue may be answered by the statements of Pope Francis when he warned against “administering a vaccine against faith”.  And the publisher fully agrees with him that there is such a thing. When the Pope mentioned ‘vaccine against faith”, definitely, he is referring to “faith” as a disease because vaccines are only intended to prevent diseases. But when he further warned against ‘administering’ the vaccine, then he logically means that he is warning against the prevention of a disease. Specifically, the statements are quoted as follows: “The pontiff said educational leaders should ask themselves “how can we proclaim Christ to a generation that is changing?” “We must be careful not to administer a vaccine against faith to them,” the 77-year-old added.”( http://ph.news.yahoo.com ) This is related to Roman Catholic Alleged Church way of presumably recent rethinking in dealing with the ‘children’ of gay cou

Only truth will set you free when faced with religious deception. Thus, search for it is required to address the issue, which is inversely related to individual's rights of freedom of choice. In turn, this freedom requires "truth" as a necessity.The less effective the exercise of freedom, e.g due to ignorance, religious arrogance, "untruthful" information, disinterest, tradition, etc., the more the enslavement by religious deception.  Its detection will not only needlooking at the "truth" but would need individual's personal commitment to study and correct one 's belief system , without which, the "truth", despite of its abundance, would be futile and worthless. Even in calamities , religious deception is present. A religious sector may act as a representative of God by substantially promoting "God is Love" but at the same

Roman Catholicism has a unique way of phrasing God. Unique in a sense that during prayers, followers are taught to make the "sign of the cross", without which prayers are not complete. In every aspect of believers' exercise of faith, the cross has a part and it is being called holy. Is it really holy? Or just an innovation or mystery by a worldly power-the Roman Empire. Historically,when Christ died, he was resurrected to life by the Father in heaven. But when the cross lost its force against early Christians, who were never afraid to die on the cross, it was resurrected to life by the Holy Father in Vatican City through the Roman Empire. Roman Catholicism adopted it as a symbol of Christianity. By comparison, Christ called the Father in heaven as "Father" but Roman Catholicism is calling the Father in Vatican City as "Holy Father". Also, the body of Christ is not being called holy but the cross became "holy". Roman Catholicism cal

Vatican's papal nuncio envoy to the Philippines, Guiseppe Pinto, delivered his Christmas "mass" message to Yolanda survivors, saying that "God is with us".Was he referring to the real God? If the survivors were not deceived enough, they might notice that the "God" that is being referred to by Mr. Pinto are the "Holy Father" in Vatican City and the alleged "holy" cross. Concerning the alleged "holy" cross-during masses and other Roman Catholic celebrations, how many times that attendees make the "sign of the cross"? Also, in Roman Catholic buildings where the masses are being celebrated, how many crosses are there?   Specifically, during the mass that was celebrated by Mr. Pinto, was the alleged "holy" cross absent? I am sure that the cross was present because Mr. Guinto uttered the words "God is with us". Mr. Pinto failed however to tell the attendees that the cross is also locate

One of the most abuse words in history is "holiness" or "holy". Traditionally, the word was used to describe non-living things, such as "holy shrine", "holy cities", "holy cross", "holy rosary" and animate things such as the "holy see". Recently, the word, in addition to "professionalism",  was used by Pope Francis who was quoted by  DZMM teleradyo, December 22, 2013 issue, as follows:  Pope Francis: Mga katoliko dapat isabuhay ang holiness (Roman Catholics should live holy) Pope Francis: Mga katoliko dapat may propesyonalismo (Roman Catholics should have professionalism) In short, Pope Francis is attacking the "unholiness" and "unprofessionalism" of Roman Catholics. But coincidentally, who is the root cause of this alleged words? Is it not the institution itself because of idolatry?

Roman Catholic Alleged Church is exposing itself what really it is when Pope Francis said that: "Church is 'depository' of God's forgiveness". After centuries of controlling the minds and spirits of followers, Catholicism is now modernizing its doctrine to include God's forgiveness as some sort of a currency. Based on statement, 'Church' has substantial amount of God's forgiveness and those in need can avail the same from it. Before believing on the utterances of the Pope, let us study first the use of the words "church" "depository" and "God forgiveness", if they are appropriately used. This is to subdue any attempt of deception. First-the word " church ", whether it was appropriately invoked. Is Roman Catholic Alleged Church a God's Church or "The Name" user church?