Pope's counter-economics
Pope Francis, in an obvious attempt to capitalize on greed or immorality in money, did attack "trickle-down" theory on economics. But does he possess a valid legal, moral and spiritual ground to attack it or the "idolatry in money". I don't think so, unless he attacks first the tradition of Roman Catholicism, which is much legally, morally and spiritually worst than anything on earth, in heaven and underneath the sea. He should attack first the "holy" cross, "holy" rosary, rosary beads and strings, and every Roman Catholic idol, which are being promoted by the alleged church. He should also return first the title of the "Holy Father" to the real owner, including all the donations, monetary or proprietary, and all the "moneys" that the Roman Catholic alleged church had benefited in selling deceptive images, statues and candles, etc and all the fees paid for baptisms, masses, weddings, burials, etc, to all...