Lust and idolatry

painted doggie
Before engaging in issues between two opposing forces related to causes of Philippine calamities, it is necessary to consider the possibility of deceptions among the parties. For example, in a recent pronouncement of Lipa Archbishop Ramon Arguelles, he blames the "ungodly" laws, e.g, Reproductive Health (RH) law, as a cause of Philippine disasters. Is he honestly correct?

First premise: The subject of the blame are the recent Philippine calamities, such as, Cebu-Bohol earthquake and Yolanda typhoon last October 15, 2013 and November 8, 2013, respectively.

Second premise: Reproductive Health Law was approved only last December 2012.


Third premise: "Lust" is being promoted in the reproductive health law.

Fourth premise: When Bohol-Cebu earthquake struck, alleged churches in Cebu City and Bohol were destroyed, consisting of 10 historic Roman Catholic Buildings. Some of the Roman Catholic idols were still standing but were not able to protect the Roman Catholic buildings.


Fifth premise: Calamities in the Philippines had been happening even before reproductive health was discussed in the Philippine Congress.

Sixth premise: Alleged Church had been in the Philippines since 1521.

Based on the above facts and circumstances, who will have a better argument? The "lust" argument which is related to "oral sex" or the idolatry argument?

Kindly refer to "oral sex theory" to fully comprehend.


Related articles:
    Lipa archbishop: 'Ungodly' laws cause disasters (ABS-CBNnews.com)
    A Poem on His Coming (wordatthenet.com)
    Spiritual Stress: Thing to Reckon (wordatthenet.com)
    Idolatry: Cause of Spiritual Stress (wordatthenet.com)
    The Oral Sex Theory (wordatthenet.com)
    Habakkuk 2 and the End Times (wordatthenet.com)
      For detailed discussions, click to Religious Deception and Morality Deception eBooks at WORDatTheNet.

      Comments

      Popular posts from this blog

      Are you praying correctly?

      Truth and religious deception